Slenderness and second-order effects
Classifies slenderness per EN 1992-1-1 §5.8.3 and applies the nominal curvature method §5.8.8 when λ exceeds λ_lim.
Privacy settings
We use Microsoft Clarity to understand how CALC is used — only if you agree. Necessary cookies keep the app working (sign-in, security, free-quota enforcement) and are always active.

SKL-000009 · Skill
EN 1990EN 1992-1-1Describe the column to Mia in your own words. Height, cross-section, concrete class and the design forces at the ends are enough to start. She classifies the slenderness, applies second-order effects using the nominal curvature method and designs the required longitudinal reinforcement for you. The result is a complete EN 1992-1-1 verification with transparent formulas, assumptions and detailing checks, ready to download as a PDF report.
Mia guides you step by stepShe guides you through the inputs and explains the results.
Braced column, pinned at both ends, height 4.0 m, rectangular section 300 x 300 mm, C30/37, B500, cnom = 35 mm, NEd = 1200 kN, first-order end moments M01 = 20 kNm, M02 = 40 kNm, effective creep ratio phi_ef = 2.0, DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA (DE). Run the design check and propose reinforcement.
Classifies slenderness per EN 1992-1-1 §5.8.3 and applies the nominal curvature method §5.8.8 when λ exceeds λ_lim.
Determines required symmetric reinforcement A_s,req using the rectangular stress block of §3.1.7 by iteration or design-chart approach.
Verifies A_s,min and A_s,max limits, minimum bar diameter, and transverse reinforcement spacing against EN 1992-1-1 §9.5.
Proposes a reinforcement layout (e.g. 4 Ø20 + links Ø8/300) satisfying both the required area and the detailing rules.
Normative basis
The checks follow these standards. Nationally determined parameters come from the National Annex selected in the form.
Edition used: DIN EN 1992-1-1:2011-01 (EN 1992-1-1:2004 + AC:2010) + DIN EN 1992-1-1/A1:2015-03
| Country | National Annex | Factors | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE | DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2013-04 + DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA/A1:2015-12Current | γC = 1.50γS = 1.15αcc = 0.85 | DIN Media |
| EN | Recommended valuesEN 1992-1-1:2004 + AC:2010 + A1:2014 | γC = 1.50γS = 1.15αcc = 1.00 | – |
Status checked on
Edition used: DIN EN 1990:2021-10 (EN 1990:2002 + A1:2005 + A1:2005/AC:2010)
| Country | National Annex | Factors | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE | DIN EN 1990/NA:2010-12 + DIN EN 1990/NA/A1:2024-05Current | γG = 1.35γQ = 1.50 | DIN Media |
| EN | Recommended valuesEN 1990:2002 + A1:2005 + A1:2005/AC:2010 | γG = 1.35γQ = 1.50 | – |
Status checked on
Frequently asked questions
Mia needs column height and boundary conditions, design axial force NEd and first-order end moments M01 and M02, cross-section dimensions, concrete class, steel grade, nominal cover or exposure class, and the effective creep ratio φef (or loading age and humidity to estimate it).
The hand method covers isolated braced columns under axial force and uniaxial bending. For biaxial bending beyond §5.8.9, unbraced frames, or walls, Mia states the method is not sufficient and recommends building an RFEM model with the Concrete Design add-on.
Per EN 1992-1-1 §9.5.2 (recommended values), As,min is the greater of 0.10·NEd/f_yd and 0.002·Ac, and As,max is 0.04·Ac; the German National Annex sets other limits. Mia calculates both limits, proposes a bar layout, and checks the minimum bar diameter (§9.5.2) and the link spacing (§9.5.3).
Mia defaults to recommended values (γC = 1.50, γS = 1.15, αcc = 1.00) and flags that the National Annex may differ. For example, the DIN NA uses αcc = 0.85. You can supply your own NA parameters and Mia will apply them.
Start with the example and adapt it to your structural system.
New calculation